Executive Summary: A product may be legally defective in New York because of a manufacturing flaw, unsafe design, or inadequate warning. To recover compensation, an injured person generally must connect the defect to the injury. Manufacturers and others in the distribution chain may potentially face liability depending on the facts. Preserving the product and other evidence early can be especially important.
A product can cause a serious injury even when the person using it did nothing wrong. A power tool may fail during normal use. A household item may break in a dangerous way. A product may also lack a warning about a risk that was not obvious.
When this happens, people often ask whether the product was legally defective.
Under New York law, a bad result alone does not prove a defect. A product liability claim usually depends on what went wrong with the product, whether that problem made it unsafe, and whether the defect helped cause the injury. New York courts generally recognize three main types of product defects: manufacturing defects, design defects, and inadequate warnings.
A manufacturing defect happens when a product does not come out of the factory the way it was supposed to.
The design itself may be safe, but something goes wrong while the product is being made or assembled. For example, a part may be installed incorrectly, a material may be weaker than required, or a component may be missing.
The key question is whether the product was different from others made according to the same design. A person bringing a claim must still connect that defect to the injury. If the flaw had nothing to do with what happened, it will not support a product liability case.
A design defect is different. In these cases, the product may have been built exactly as planned, but the design itself may have been unsafe.
New York courts use a risk-versus-utility analysis in many design defect cases. A product may be considered defectively designed when it is not reasonably safe and a safer design was practical without destroying the product’s usefulness. Courts may look at the seriousness of the danger, the likelihood of injury, the cost of a safer design, and other factors. This can come up with products such as:
These cases often require detailed review of engineering records, testing, product specifications, and possible safer designs.
Some products have risks that cannot be removed completely. In those cases, manufacturers may have a duty to provide proper warnings or instructions.
A product may be legally defective if it does not warn users about a danger that is not obvious and could reasonably be expected during use. New York courts have also recognized that a failure-to-warn claim may sometimes survive even when a product was altered after it left the manufacturer.
Warnings should be clear enough to help users avoid the danger. A vague, hidden, or incomplete warning may not be enough. The issue is not simply whether the product had a warning label. The question is whether the warning reasonably explained the risk.
A product liability case may involve more than the manufacturer.
Under New York law, parties in the distribution chain may sometimes face liability when a defective product causes injury. This can include manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, and sellers, depending on the facts of the case.
Determining who should be included in a claim may require tracing how the product was designed, made, shipped, sold, and maintained. Preserving the actual product can also be critical. Throwing it away, repairing it, or changing it after an accident can make it harder to prove what caused the failure.
A strong product liability case generally needs evidence showing that the product was defective and that the defect was a substantial factor in causing the injury. Useful evidence may include:
New York generally provides a three-year limitations period for product liability injury claims, although the exact deadline can depend on the circumstances. Waiting can also cause evidence to disappear long before the filing deadline arrives.
A serious product injury can raise difficult questions about design, manufacturing, warnings, and corporate responsibility. Getting clear answers may require digging far deeper than the surface explanation.
At Silberstein & Miklos, we take on difficult injury cases and do not give up because a defendant is large or the evidence takes work to uncover. Our attorneys have appeared before the Appellate Division and the New York Court of Appeals more than 100 times.
If you were injured by a product you believe was unsafe, contact Silberstein & Miklos for a free consultation. We will review what happened, examine the available evidence, and determine what legal options may be available.
New York product liability claims commonly involve manufacturing defects, design defects, and failure to provide adequate warnings.
No. A recall is not required for a product liability claim. The issue is whether the product was defective and caused injury.
Potentially. New York law may allow claims against parties in the product’s distribution chain, including sellers, depending on the circumstances.
Yes, when it is safe to do so. The product itself may be some of the most important evidence in the case. Avoid repairing, altering, or throwing it away before speaking with an attorney.
New York generally applies a three-year limitations period to product liability injury claims, though exceptions can affect the deadline.
Depending on the injury, compensation may include medical expenses, lost income, reduced earning ability, pain and suffering, and other losses caused by the injury.
Recommended brain injury specialists in New York. Recommended brain injury specialists in New York depend…
underinsured motorist settlement attorney Suffolk If an underinsured driver caused your Suffolk County crash, your…
If an uninsured driver causes a crash during an Uber trip in New York, you…
Compare solo practitioners vs firms for TBI lawsuits. Compare solo practitioners vs firms for TBI…
Top attorneys for pedestrian brain injury accidents. Choosing among top attorneys for pedestrian brain injury…
Injured during an Uber ride in Manhattan? Get medical attention, make sure the crash is…